What is the best college essay editing service

Such often refuted cavils are, however, constantly Bigotry. And we may observe, that if the supposition of The same objections original adjustment superseding continual interposi- must apply to all tion be objectionable in the instance of a succession physical theories. Its use in parturition has been anathematised as an in- fraction of the penalty pronounced on Eve! Others have denounced all theories of physical evolution as leading to and implying Pantheism, an accusation, if possible, more strange and groundless. The theological question between development and successive " creations " is simply whether we suppose the Creator to construct a machine which, once adjusted, shall go on fulfilling its work, or one which ESSAY III. The Pantheistic theory (to carry on the same metaphor) would assert that the machine was self-animated, or was itself the artificer or regu- lator of its own parts and movements. The first idea (at least rational and worthy) has manifestly nothing in common with the latter absurdity. But the main source of the difficulty and objec- objections to develop- tions which have been felt, on religious grounds, ment theory on doctri- against any what is the best college essay editing service theory of the evolution of organised nai and scriptural existence by the agency of natural causes, is their grounds, supposed repugnance to particular views of what is the best college essay editing service theologi- cal doctrines, and the declarations of Scripture on which those doctrines are founded.

Even where of all what is a good essay writing service competently informed persons at the present day, admitted, other doubts after a long struggle for existence, the literal belief remain in the Judaical cosmogony, it may now be said, has died a natural death. Yet many are still haunted by its phantom, which perpetually disturbs their minds with apprehensions equally groundless on col- lateral points. And that the " immense period at the beginning," followed by a recent literal great catastrophe and final recon- struction in a week, is, if possible, more strangely at variance with science, Scripture, and common sense. Yet, while they thus view the labours of the Bible geologists as fruitless attempts, they often do not see that they are fruitless, not because they fail in detail, but because they proceed altogether on wrong grounds and in a wrong direction, and thus remain under the dominion of the same radically ESSAY III. Yet there are those who seem to view these last ideas with more peculiar ap- prehension. The discrepancy cannot really be greater whether we adopt any physical theory of the mode of origination of successive forms, or whether we reject all such speculation.

In a word, those who accept what is the best college essay editing service geological truths at all, and admit the palpable contradiction to the Old Testament, without preju- dice to their faith, cannot with consistency make it a ground of objection to any hypotheses of the nature of the changes indicated, that they are contrary to Scripture. From metaphysical principles of this kind the author deduces the ESSAY III.

But with reference to the opinions of those who lay so much stress on the letter of the Bible in such points I would merely observe that, whatever may be the value of other arguments in support of it, it is wholly destitute of any founda- tion in Scriptural authority. He ascribes the existence of the universe in the first instance to the Divine will : " God spake, and it was. Organised Moreover, in the particular instances of the crea- beings not formed out tion of animals and plants, it is notorious that in the of nothing.

The prevalent theology is too deeply immersed in Scriptural an indiscriminate and unthinking Bibliolatry. But tions adapted to even on the writing services for research papers fullest admission of inspiration, the the state of knowledge.

Law school essay review service research paper geography pdf lisa homework club expository essay spm argumentative essay body paragraph examples.


Thus, more precisely with respect to the subject Reference to creation of " Creation," the writers of the New Testament, in tbe New Testament. The prevalent belief in the very recent origin of man, geologically speaking, depends wholly on negative evidence. And if such remains were to occur, it is equally accordant with all analogy to ex- pect that they might be those of an extinct and Lower species. The only real distinction in the history of creation which marks a supposed " human epoch " is not the first introduction of the animal man in how- ever high a state of organisation, but the endow- ment of that animal with the gift of a moral and spiritual nature. It is a perfectly conceivable idea that a lower species of the human race might have existed destitute of this endowment. The belief in the recent date of man is usually From the Hebrew adopted from the received Hebrew chronology, itself chronology, (as is well known) open to critical difficulties. But, indeed, to those who imagine the Old Testament authoritative in matters of philosophy or chronology, there is no limit to inferences of this kind. There are some, even, who believe that the " permanence of species" is a Scriptural doctrine, because it is said that plants " after their kind " " have their seed in themselves! Physical origin of man inde- pendent of his moral nature.

Objection with regard to the pri- meval state of man.

But the idea of a physical process of origination of organic life has excited a more peculiar opposition, on the ground that it would include MAN and his descent in the general category, and represent the human race as at some remote period gradually developed out of an inferior species, which, it is alleged, savours of materialism, and lowers the moral dignity of man.

The same moral superiority may equally belong to him whether originally evolved out of any form of earlier organic life or out of a clod of earth. The difficulties felt on this subject by some seem mainly to arise out of the belief with respect to See Essay I.

But if we look to the New Testament view of the matter, it will be perceived that the Christian argu- ment assumes man in a state of degradation and sin, from which it would elevate and transform him by the renovating power of Divine grace. As to any previous state, or the origin of that depravity, St. Thus the theologian can have no ground for denouncing such physical speculations as impious or subversive of scriptural truth.

Objections To urge objections, however, on theological brought forward by grounds against such theories has been a popular Mr Hugh Miller. Yet throughout the whole we cannot but observe that the polemical spirit and avowed theological bias with which it is written cannot but weaken the authority of many parts of his physical argument. The author, though a very strenuous theological what is the best college essay editing service champion, is yet candid enough to allow that the theory of transmutation, if established, would not be H H 3 470 PHILOSOPHY OF CREATION. Origin of There are many who in their zeal for the authority objections in narrow of the Old Testament overlook, or, indeed, seem Judaical views. It can only be in the want of a more worthy ap- in no wa affecting preciation of the true nature and real independence Christi- anity, of Christianity that we hear denunciations of more enlightened views as " removing the landmarks of all religious and moral obligations," because the autho- rity of the Old Testament is thus invaded, which, however, a slight attention to what is the best college essay editing service the language of the Apostle of the Gentiles must convince any unpreju- diced inquirer has been in modern times unhappily mixed up with Christianity in a way directly opposed to the whole spirit and tenor of his teaching.

How to buy a term paper writing a compare and contrast research paper homework excuses for strict teachers dissertation proposal guidelines vanderbilt application essay questions.