Essay outline help
What the legal restraint amounts to, when all the Canons are considered, is hard to ima- gine.
The Articles are flexible, and there is latitude of interpretation, — with many open ques- tions. Not that this state of things ought to last, in a Multitudinist Church. Subscription essay outline help being abolished, the Articles them- selves might remain, (to gratify anti-Eoman feeling). Each one 4 of us when born into a Nation is born into a Spiritual 4 Society. The Gospel would be narrow and one- 4 sided, if it did not quicken Nationality, but only pro- 4 vided essay outline help isolated 4 4 salvation," — a notion which unfits men 4 for this life. At least there should be no needless ob- 4 stacles to National Unity, even if it cannot be perfectly 4 secured. All may verbally accept Scrip- 4 ture, in some sense. Ideal methods of interpretation 4 may go far at last to unite all. What the speculation means as a whole, is 214 THE IDEA OF THE NATIONAL CHURCH.
If that theory were accepted by us, and further acted out, it must involve (as will be seen) the rejection of the entire Christianity of the Bible, or the Church, ancient or modern.
This is the point to be made clear, and not, of course, barely as- serted, by those who differ from "the Essayist.
For 1,800 years our Eeligion has been in the position of an in- tellectual and moral superior, and could generally make terms, as such, with a decaying or uncouth civilization wherever essay outline help it came. But the nineteenth century, it is said now, professes to be intellectually and morally in advance of us, — an alienation between the Church of the past, and the times we live in, is even boasted of. But the supernatural character hitherto attributed to OF BROAD, OR GENERALIZED CHRISTIANITY. For to say, you will accept as fche Ideal of the Bible, and hold yourself at liberty Multitudillism - afterwards to reject it piece-meal, seems simply, to most persons, unintelligible, if not absurd. We are not asking too much if, in the name of reason, we do our best to ascertain what educated men mean, when, with an air of superiority, they profess to believe in Christ, not only apart from the history and tradition of His followers, but apart from the record of His life and teaching in the four Gospels. Let us have the theory clearly expressed and logically worked out, to some extent, of a generalized Christianity, independent of historical creeds, his- torical Scriptures, and historical continuity. It is hard to ask us to commit ourselves to such a scheme, without knowing something about it.
The course taken by our eclectic opponents seems to Christianity to be this. The Protestantism of the age is pleased, too, by such appeal to a purely Documentary Eevelation, is soothed by the deference to " private judgment," and hoodwinked by the rejection of "an- tiquity. This way of proceeding is to be indignantly de- precated by honest thinkers.
There followed indeed a temporary religious re-action of a Puritan spirit, — but with no intellectual life.
The generality, of the Bible, so painfully appealed to, doubtless lean on Scripture, (for they feel that they must have something :) they cannot themselves examine much of it, and essay outline help they see not what is to become of them, if they are to be given over to the authority of " critics for that seems as 21 8 THE IDEA OF THE NATIONAL CHURCH. To submit to scholars, — might it not at custom written term papers once lead to a narrower and more stringent tyranny than that of ecclesiastics?
Among those who now shrink the most from the The concessions critical destruction of Scripture as the of the alarmed.
Let them tell us, in no misty or evasive sentences, what their OF BROAD, OR GENERALIZED CHRISTIANITY. To have any anxiety as to the ultimate results of the most searching investigation of Scrip- The position ture would betray, in any case, a feeble- of cyclamen, ness of faith, which the well-taught Christian would but pity. They who know that their " house cannot fall," for it is "founded upon a rock g ," must not be supposed to be fearful for themselves because they are willing to help others who are tossing on the waves.
All that the most patient and penetrating learning, or the most advanced science, shall ever teach, the truth-loving Christian will welcome. They, on the other hand, who have surrendered the an- cient Creeds, (and with them so much of the living grace of the Gospel,) must make the best defence they can of all that remains to them of the " deposit of faith. But, accepting for a moment the assumption with which the generalizers of our religion Example of the. Process of Gen- would begin, it is not difficult to see erasing, how, step by step, the whole order of the "new cre- g St.
But may we not conclude that Christ thus deferred to the national prejudices of His country- men? Is it pos- sible to accept the words of that Evangelist, who tells us m that Moses and Elias came from the invisible world to hold a supernatural conversation with Christ on the Mount n , — when we have been compelled to reject, or suspect, what he says about Sodom and Gomorrha? It is strictly deduced from the principles of "Essayism. A Christianity without certainty of a single fact of the Gospel, from the Incarnation to the Eesurrection of Christ, — that is the shadow of religion to which these eclectics and critics would lead our nation. Or, if all this be denied, and they mislike this plain language, once more, in the name of all reason and fairness, we repeat our chal- lenge, and call on our new teachers to tell us openly, in their own words, what their u Generalized Chris- tianity" is to be? It is not said, or implied for a moment, that the best custom essay writing services Reserving aii scheme of vague religion here delineated chanty. Let these halting and feeble-minded thinkers be made to take any part of the New Testament, in which there is any reference to the Old, and reason from it. Broad Christianity compared with the Apostolic Age.
But the generalizes of our religion are not con- sistent.
For, after using the language of utter scepticism, we find them, perhaps in the next page, referring (with- out hint of " criticism") to the documents of the ISTew Testament as in some sense trustworthy evidence still, for some of the facts of Primitive Christianity, St. Let this then be examined in the next place, — Whether, from the first, it was the intention of Christianity (as affirmed) to provide a " generalized religion" for the multitude, of an in- clusive kind? And whether this can be fairly learned from the Christian Scriptures, which are here happily, though inconsistently, called to give evidence, by those who regard them as so very uncertain, if not also frequently false?