But he seems to have little respect for such matters as these. PauVs life" he says, "have gone far beyond the line of utility e. Be it so, that the Tliessalonians imagined, when the words of that Epistle " first struck on their ears," that the Day of the Lord was close at hand. But our enquiry is, not what they thought, but what St. Paul to the Thessalonians was the first written of all his Epistles, and that the second Epistle to the Thessalonians was written at the same place as the first and very soon after it. In that second Epistle we read a solemn caution from St. Paul, guarding them against the notion that the " Day of Christ was at hand V If St. But we see that he did not entertain it when he wrote the second Epistle. Nor had he any such belief when he wrote his first Epistle, and he was not " cor- rected in his expectation by the course of events. The simple truth is, that the Holy Spirit is speaking by St, Paul, who utters "by the Word of the Lord" what is here revealed. He is writing an Epistle not merely for one Church or one age, but to be read in the Church of Christ in every country in every age, even till the Coming of Christ. Paul the Holy Spirit delivers a solemn warning, which every age must i See, for instance, Eom. Every one ought so to believe and live as if Christ would come in his own day. Therefore with great wisdom has the Holy Spirit spoken by St. Paul on this subject in such a language as that which represents him as contemporaneous with every age. It is the language of the Eternal Himself, Once more.
We have seen that in the second Epi- stle to the Thessalonians St. Paul warns his readers against the supposition that " the day of Christ was at hand.
About three years after the date of that second Epi- stle he wrote his first Epistle to the Corinthians, and in that Epistle he uses the pronoun " tve" in the same manner as he had editing thesis done in the first Epistle to the Thessalonians. He says, " We shall not all sleep," that is, we shall not all die, " but we shall all be changed 1.
Paul himself had disclaimed any such notion in the second Epistle to the Thessalonians, that St. Paul, — or rather to the Holy Spirit, who spake by St.
M Admirable candour, most Christian con- descension!
But let us see whether there may not be here some appearance of inaccuracy and want of learning and ability, as well as of modesty and humi- lity, on the part of a writer who deals thus freely with the Gospels. The Essayist would quiet our alarms by assuring us that though there are, as he alleges, " discrepancies of fact " in Scripture, yet that " when we become familiar with them they will seem of little consequence in comparison with the truths which it unfolds.
For, surely the answer must be, 1 If the documents are in error, what will become of the doctrines? How can we be certain that the very texts upon which we rest our doctrines and our hopes may not be the uninspired portion of it p? Schleiermacher, De Wette, Strauss, Bruno Bauer, and others, — especially the English Sceptic already quoted q , who has anticipated the Essayist in almost all his allegations against the writers of Holy Scripture, — have made the same objections before him.
Matthew dwells therefore particularly on the birth of Jesus at Bethlehem, the city of David, the city pre- announced by the Hebrew p Creed of Christendom, p. Luke speaks of them as living at Nazareth before the birth of J esus, Matthew as having left their former residence to go to Nazareth only after that event, and from peculiar considerations. Critics, however, are disposed to think Matthew right on this occa- sion. They trace the descent through an entirely different line of ancestry.
Matthew thus leads the Jews to acknowledge that Jesus is the Christ. He lays stress on the birth at Bethlehem, and with divine wisdom omits what is not relevant to his argument in that Gospel, the previous residence of the parents at Nazareth. Luke, editing thesis in his Gospel, the Gospel of the Gentile world, to whom it would be welcome intelligence that the Saviour of mankind was conceived in Nazareth, in Galilee of the Gentiles. Thus the Holy Spirit shews to all who are willing to learn, that He knows when to speak and when to be silent.
Thus He dispenses suitable food to all in due season s. Matthew, designed to shew his readers, especially his Hebrew readers, that Jesus of Nazareth was the promised seed of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob, and that He was the King of the Jews, and came of the royal tribe of Judah, and r Micah v. Davidson, (formerly Professor in the Lancashire Independent College,) " Introduction to the Gospels," pp. It may well editing thesis excite the shame and sorrow of all friends of the Church and Universities , that sceptical allegations, exploded in Dissenting Colleges, should be revived by clergymen of the English Church, Professors and Tutors in an English University.
This is what the Holy Spirit has done by means of the genealogy in the Gospel of essay help websites St Matthew. Are we to murmur against Him because He has been pleased to do something more than this? But if he really means that they are not consistent with one another, let him be requested to read what St.
Augustine has written on this subject 11 , and he may perhaps change his opinion. Certainly not to any who have carefully examined the subject.
As to the appearance of discrepancy, it rests only on a misinterpretation of John xviii. Mark says that u it was the preparation, that is, the day before the Sabbath 7 St. Luke says, " that day was the preparation, and the Sabbath drew onV "What now does St.
And yet the Essayist tells us that " they appear to differ as to the day of the crucifixion!
He does not let us know the grounds of this assertion. This is one of the melancholy characteristics of this book.
They know not why they were inflicted, and perhaps when they consider the character and office of the person who inflicts them, they may think that they were deserved. John says, that Pilate took his place upon the judgment- seat when it was " about the sixth hour.