Buy a philosophy paper
That focus, however, becomes a point of learning for both teacher and students. Sometimes texts are analyzed for repetition or for change. Sometimes the perceptions of a teacher are compared with those of students. Sometimes a prototypical student helps us understand how what we ask of students connects with earlier experiences, conflicts with other curricula, or constructs students in ways intended and not.
The analysis itself only signifies within a specified context, and explicating that context — and often more than one — brings meaning to the analysis. Reflective teaching relies on the past to point us in appropriate directions.
As buy a philosophy paper the editors observe, individual chapters are the local versions of global concerns: course design, assignments, supporting activities, and teacher response and assessment. Put differently, our master narratives of the teaching of writing are rewritten through these individual accounts. What struck me when I first heard Shulman talk about reflective teach- ing and about the two tasks that enable teachers to make knowl- edge was how formal they seemed. For him, sharing seems to be the decidedly public act that we see in this volume, an interrup- tion of teaching that is luxurious in its infrequency, typically at predetermined points on a school calendar. There is, however, another way to understand cessation of activity and to define the sharing that follows. In fact, we do have opportunities to stop prac- tice, as we do to share what we think we have learned. Given the ubiquity of electronic conversation, I share with col- leagues around the country, and they share with me.
And today I wonder as well if sharing, in this sense, also means sharing with students, bringing our observa- tions and hypotheses to them. Perhaps in making this knowl- edge — for that too is what reflective teaching is about — we will find in students our best audience and our best collaborators both. In other words, teaching and learning can be systematic and predictable.
A quarter of a buy a write my college essay me philosophy paper century ago Richard Young made much the same argument about writing.
In opposition to those who under- stood writing as a solitary and random act subject only to muse and prayer, Young argued the reverse: that writing is not myste- rious, that it is more than a gift or a talent, and that it can be taught and learned. If he regards each situation as unique, he has no reason to believe that a technique that was useful once will be useful again. If, then, the situation and its more general features can be identified, we can employ those again to good effect — as writers, and by implication, as teachers. One crucially important implication of this dif- ference, he maintains, is that the artist can teach others to carry out the activity, while those who merely have a knack cannot. Or she speaks in terms of con- text, for instance, about the placement of an assignment within a curriculum. Or in terms of a responding strategy that goes be- yond conventional understanding, widely held beliefs, or pub- lished research. In other words, reflective teachers assign causality to the stuff of teaching — tasks and processes and outcomes — as well as to the match between that stuff and the particular stu- dents who are themselves creating the stuff of learning. Moreover, reflective teaching, in its understanding of the relationship of individual iteration to generalizations, is a deliberate art. It relies on four assumptions that link theory, practice, and data — that link teaching and learning.
Reflective teaching is more than useful, however, and more than important, although it is both of those. Reflective teaching changes the world we inhabit precisely because it changes all of us. When the idea for the book presented itself, both of us were in the midst of either preparing new writing teachers for the classroom or designing workshops for experienced writ- ing teachers. As we talked long distance about our respective faculty-development projects, we suddenly discovered that both of us were confronting the same problem: how to introduce teach- ers to effective classroom practices while at the same time stress- ing the importance of disciplinary and institutional contexts. As experienced teachers, we understood the necessity of situating a particular teaching method within the context of current research and theory on teaching, learning, and writing. Although there are many resources available for preparing writing teachers, none seemed to fit our complex needs. Not only did we want to emphasize the importance of context and reflec- tion, but also we wanted our students to see how real teachers think through various aspects of classroom practice.
And because neither of us was employed by a state university with a large graduate program and the accompanying numbers of graduate teaching assistants to prepare, we needed something that would work for the assortment of graduate students and instructors we encountered: secondary English teachers pursuing an M. From the responses we received, we have compiled a collection of essays composed by writing teachers that describe a particular aspect of instruction (e. Because we believe that the theoretical underpinnings of teach- ing writing cross contexts, we have included buy a philosophy paper contributors who represent a variety of teaching locations, including high schools, community colleges, Research I universities, and regional univer- sity campuses. Equally important, these contributors are posi- tioned in diverse ways withirrtheir institutions.
Some dedicate most of their time to teaching, while others combine teaching with administrative work. Besides representing an assortment of institutions, theoreti- cal positions, and instructors, the essays describe a variety of writing courses, not just first-year composition. Although many instructors begin their careers teaching this course, some, if not most, will eventually teach a range of writing courses, from basic writing to advanced composition and even graduate workshops. We see this book, then, not only as a collection that meets the needs of new teach- ers but also as one that can grow with teachers as they encounter new courses, move to new institutions, and collect more experi- ence. Perhaps the most difficult aspect of this project was clarify- ing theoretical contexts. The tension between theory and prac- tice is long established in writing studies (as in other disciplines), and the call for connecting theory and practice is a common one. In many colleges and universities, however, theory — or theoreti- — xx — Introduction cal work — is still privileged over teaching, while in other con- texts, such as community colleges and secondary schools, theory is downplayed or disparaged in favor of practical techniques.